Here are six things we learned from them including whether they would change their verdict in hindsight.
According toThe Jury Speaks, the jurors were particularly struck by the gruesome images of Blacks butchered body.
You feel queasy and nauseous.
Credit: James Nielsen/Getty Images
Gongora stated that the revelation of the receipts marked another ah-ha moment, another strong piece of evidence.
I thought, Its going to be a very interesting, interesting trial.'
Nelson said of Dursts testimony, He had an answer for everything that was posed to him.
That falls on the prosecution of not proving that side of the case.
Chris is real talkative, Darby added.
(More on Lovell in a moment.)
Deliberations went on for several days.
Eventually, the two holdouts against a not-guilty verdict came around.
The Alternate
The general public was shocked by the not-guilty verdict, and so was Brents.
(As an alternate juror, she did not deliberate.)
I had several phone calls from jurors, Brents recalled.
And when he kills again, its going to be on your head.'
I have been a criminal lawyer, prosecutor, judge for almost 30 years, Criss said.
He doesnt appreciate all your talk about him being guilty.
He wants you to keep your mouth shut.'
They were told repeatedly by the defense attorneys that the dismemberment had no role in it.
And I couldnt explain that to them for the state.
Asked by a producer if she would call that tampering, Criss shrugged.
But that doesnt mean that someone else didnt.
So I voted not guilty.
All the other jurors, however, said they would now vote guilty, with some citing Dursts apparentJinxconfession.
Coming straight out of the persons mouth, guilty, Warren said.
Gongora agreed, and also looked ahead to Dursts looming trial for Bermans murder.
For more onThe Jury Speaks, read EWs postmortems for theO.J.
Simpson,Michael Jackson, andGeorge Zimmermanepisodes.
